Apple is escalating a legal move tied to the U.S. Department of Justice’s ongoing antitrust case by asking a U.S. court to seek internal documents from Samsung in South Korea.
What Apple is requesting
Apple is effectively asking the court to:
-
Issue a formal request for Samsung internal records
-
Obtain those documents through cross-border discovery procedures
-
Use them as evidence in the DOJ antitrust case involving Apple’s business practices
These documents are believed to be located in South Korea, which requires court-approved international legal cooperation to access.
Why Samsung documents matter
While Samsung is not the defendant in the DOJ case, Apple appears to believe Samsung’s internal materials could be relevant because:
-
Samsung is Apple’s largest competitor in smartphones
-
The DOJ case examines market structure and competition in mobile ecosystems
-
Internal communications could provide context on:
-
Market behavior
-
Competitive strategies
-
Industry impact of Apple’s platform decisions
-
Legal context
This type of request falls under:
-
International discovery rules (often through judicial cooperation treaties)
-
U.S. antitrust litigation procedures allowing third-party evidence collection
-
Court approval is required before foreign evidence can be formally requested
Apple cannot directly obtain these documents—it must go through the court system.
Bottom line
Apple is attempting to strengthen its position in the DOJ antitrust case by seeking access to Samsung internal documents, arguing they may contain relevant evidence about smartphone market competition. The move is procedural but could become strategically important depending on what those documents reveal.
This filing is part of the broader U.S. Department of Justice antitrust case against Apple, and it shows how deeply the litigation is now moving into cross-border evidence gathering.
What Apple is trying to do
Apple is asking a U.S. court to issue a formal request under the Hague Evidence Convention, which would allow it to seek documents held in another country—in this case, South Korea.
The target is Samsung Electronics, specifically records held by its South Korean parent company, not its U.S. subsidiary.
The requested materials include:
-
Market research and smartphone sales data -
Financial performance data -
Consumer switching behavior analyses (including use of Samsung Smart Switch) -
Wearables ecosystem documents (Galaxy Watch, Galaxy Store agreements) -
Digital payments information (Samsung Pay vs. Apple Pay economics)
Why Samsung is central to the case
Samsung is repeatedly referenced in the DOJ complaint as:
-
Apple’s closest smartphone competitor globally
-
A key benchmark for market competition analysis
The plaintiffs argue Apple’s ecosystem controls influenced competitive behavior in the broader mobile market, including:
-
Wearables strategy shifts (like Samsung’s smartwatch compatibility decisions)
-
App distribution and payment system dynamics
-
Developer ecosystem constraints across platforms
The dispute over access to documents
A key procedural issue:
-
Apple subpoenaed Samsung Electronics America
-
That U.S. subsidiary repeatedly said it does not hold the requested documents
-
It claims the records exist only within the South Korean parent company
Apple says this objection was raised 65 times, prompting the request for international legal assistance.
What happens next
If the court agrees:
-
A formal request would be sent to South Korea under the Hague Convention
-
South Korean authorities would decide whether and how to comply
-
Samsung could still challenge disclosure under Korean law
This means even approval in the U.S. does not guarantee Apple will get the data.
Bottom line
Apple is trying to compel access to Samsung internal data as part of the DOJ antitrust discovery process, arguing it is directly relevant to competition and consumer switching in the smartphone and digital services markets. The outcome now depends on both U.S. court approval and international cooperation procedures.